Early outcomes from the Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis study (MIRCAST).

BACKGROUND: The impact of method of anastomosis and minimally invasive surgical technique on surgical and clinical outcomes after right hemicolectomy is uncertain. The aim of the MIRCAST study was to compare intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis (ICA and ECA respectively), each using either a laparoscopic approach or robot-assisted surgery during right hemicolectomies for benign or malignant tumours. METHODS: This was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational, monitored, non-randomized, parallel, four-cohort study (laparoscopic ECA; laparoscopic ICA; robot-assisted ECA; robot-assisted ICA). High-volume surgeons (at least 30 minimally invasive right colectomy procedures/year) from 59 hospitals across 12 European countries treated patients over a 3-year interval The primary composite endpoint was 30-day success, defined by two measures of efficacy-absence of surgical wound infection and of any major complication within the first 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were: overall complications, conversion rate, duration of operation, and number of lymph nodes harvested. Propensity score analysis was used for comparison of ICA with ECA, and robot-assisted surgery with laparoscopy. RESULTS: Some 1320 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis (laparoscopic ECA, 555; laparoscopic ICA, 356; robot-assisted ECA, 88; robot-assisted ICA, 321). No differences in the co-primary endpoint at 30 days after surgery were observed between cohorts (7.2 and 7.6 per cent in ECA and ICA groups respectively; 7.8 and 6.6 per cent in laparoscopic and robot-assisted groups). Lower overall complication rates were observed after ICA, specifically less ileus, and nausea and vomiting after robot-assisted procedures. CONCLUSION: No difference in the composite outcome of surgical wound infections and severe postoperative complications was found between intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis or laparoscopy versus robot-assisted surgery.

Nuestra experiencia en el manejo diagnóstico-terapéutico a corto plazo del paciente con displasia anal / Our experience in the short-term diagnostic-therapeutic management of the patient with anal dysplasia

Introducción: La neoplasia intraepitelial anal (NIA) es una lesión premaligna del carcinoma escamoso anal. Los varones VIH que tienen sexo con varones, es la población de riesgo más afectada. La citología y anuscopia son los métodos mejor aceptados para su diagnóstico, aunque es controvertido qué pacientes deben completarlo con una biopsia. Tampoco está bien establecido qué pacientes deben someterse a tratamiento y cuál es el mejor. Con este estudio, queremos exponer nuestra experiencia en el manejo diagnóstico-terapéutico de la NIA a corto plazo. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes con riesgo de NIA con una citología anal alterada a los que se les realizó una anuscopia de alta resolución con biopsia. Tras la confirmación histológica de displasia iniciaron tratamiento con ácido tricloroacético. Se comprobó su efectividad con una citología posterior. Se analizaron las variables demográficas de la muestra y los resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas y de tratamiento. Resultados: La mayoría eran varones VIH positivos (104/115) y el 50% mantenían relaciones sexuales con otros varones. Se incluyeron 115 pacientes con citología anal alterada, de los cuales el 92% presentaron displasia en la biopsia. El 97% con atipia de significado incierto en la citología presentaron displasia histológicamente. El 60% de los pacientes normalizó la citología tras el tratamiento. Conclusión: Se debe considerar de forma sistemática la detección precoz de la NIA en poblaciones de riesgo conocidas. Cualquier anormalidad citológica debe ser biopsiada. El ácido tricloroacético puede ser un tratamiento efectivo consiguiendo un alto porcentaje de regresión, aunque actualmente la información con la que contamos es de bajo nivel de evidencia. (AU)

Introduction: Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a premalignant lesion of anal squamous cell carcinoma. HIV-positive males who have sex with males, are the most affected at-risk population. Cytology and anuscopy are the best accepted methods for its diagnosis, although it is controversial which patients should complete it with a biopsy. Neither which patients should undergo treatment nor which is the best treatment is not well established. With this study, we would like to present our experience in the diagnostic-therapeutic management of AIN in the short term. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients at risk of AIN with altered anal cytology who underwent high-resolution anuscopy with biopsy. After histological confirmation of dysplasia, they started treatment with trichloroacetic acid. Its effectiveness was verified by subsequent cytology. The demographic variables of the sample and the results of both diagnostic and treatment tests were analyzed. Results: The majority were HIV-positive males (104/115) and 50% had sexual relations with other men. We included 115 patients with altered anal cytology, of whom 92% had dysplasia on biopsy. 97% with atypia of uncertain significance on cytology had histological dysplasia. Cytology normalized after treatment in 60% of patients. Conclusion: Early detection of AIN should be routinely considered in known at-risk populations. Any cytological abnormality should be biopsied. Tricholoroacetic acid can be an effective treatment achieving a high percentage of regression, although currently, the information we have is of low level of evidence. (AU)

Our experience in the short-term diagnostic-therapeutic management of the patient with anal dysplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a premalignant lesion of anal squamous cell carcinoma. HIV-positive males who have sex with males, are the most affected at-risk population. Cytology and anuscopy are the best accepted methods for its diagnosis, although it is controversial which patients should complete it with a biopsy. Neither which patients should undergo treatment nor which is the best treatment is not well established. With this study, we would like to present our experience in the diagnostic-therapeutic management of AIN in the short term. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients at risk of AIN with altered anal cytology who underwent high-resolution anuscopy with biopsy. After histological confirmation of dysplasia, they started treatment with trichloroacetic acid. Its effectiveness was verified by subsequent cytology. The demographic variables of the sample and the results of both diagnostic and treatment tests were analyzed. RESULTS: The majority were HIV-positive males (104/115) and 50% had sexual relations with other men. We included 115 patients with altered anal cytology, of whom 92% had dysplasia on biopsy. 97% with atypia of uncertain significance on cytology had histological dysplasia. Cytology normalized after treatment in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Early detection of AIN should be routinely considered in known at-risk populations. Any cytological abnormality should be biopsied. Tricholoroacetic acid can be an effective treatment achieving a high percentage of regression, although currently, the information we have is of low level of evidence.

Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum: Shared decision-making or still subjective?

AIM: The choice of whether to perform protective ileostomy (PI) after anterior resection (AR) is mainly guided by risk factors (RFs) responsible for the development of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, clear guidelines about PI creation are still lacking in the literature and this is often decided according to the surgeon's preferences, experiences or feelings. This qualitative study aims to investigate, by an open-ended question survey, the individual surgeon's decision-making process regarding PI creation after elective AR. METHOD: Fifty four colorectal surgeons took part in an electronic survey to answer the questions and describe what usually led their decision to perform PI. A content analysis was used to code the answers. To classify answers, five dichotomous categories (In favour/Against PI, Listed/Unlisted RFs, Typical/Atypical, Emotions/Non-emotions, Personal experience/No personal experience) have been developed. RESULTS: Overall, 76% of surgeons were in favour of PI creation and 88% considered listed RFs in the question of whether to perform PI. Atypical answers were reported in 10% of cases. Emotions and personal experience influenced surgeons' decision-making process in 22% and 49% of cases, respectively. The most frequently considered RFs were the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (96%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (88%), a positive intraoperative leak test (65%), blood loss (37%) and immunosuppression therapy (35%). CONCLUSION: The indications to perform PI following rectal cancer surgery lack standardization and evidence-based guidelines are required to inform practice. Until then, expert opinion can be helpful to assist the decision-making process in patients who have undergone AR for adenocarcinoma.

Fístula colovesical: aplicabilidad del abordaje laparoscópico y resultados según su etiología / Colovesical Fistula: Applicability of the Laparoscopic Approach and Results According to Etiology

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las fístulas colovesicales son una entidad poco frecuente y con una incidencia precisa desconocida. El objetivo de este estudio es describir una serie de casos de pacientes intervenidos por fístula colovesical de origen benigno y maligno y valorar la aplicabilidad del abordaje laparoscópico en ambos grupos. MÉTODOS: Realizamos un estudio descriptivo de 34 pacientes intervenidos en nuestro centro entre enero de 2001 y marzo de 2018 con el diagnóstico de fístula colovesical. Se incluyen pacientes intervenidos de manera electiva (28) y de urgencia (6). Se categorizaron según el diagnóstico mediante pruebas complementarias por TC abdominal, colonoscopia y cistoscopia, y se realizó un abordaje laparoscópico en los pacientes sin infiltración del trígono vesical y plano retroperitoneal y con situación clínica favorable. RESULTADOS: En los casos con patología benigna (13) se realizaron 4 intervenciones vía laparotómica y 9 vía laparoscópica, con 3 conversiones. En todos los casos se realizó sigmoidectomía. En 11 pacientes se realizó cistectomía parcial y en 2 casos el manejo fue conservador con sonda vesical. En los 21 pacientes con patología maligna se realizaron 5 abordajes laparoscópicos y se convirtieron 3, con 16 casos abordados vía laparotómica. Se realizaron sigmoidectomía, hemicolectomía izquierda, resección anterior y exenteración pélvica, y abordaje urológico en todos los casos. Dieciséis pacientes (76%) tuvieron complicaciones, la mayoría menores (I-II según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo) e intervenidos por abordaje laparotómico. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento de elección en las fístulas colovesicales es la cirugía con resección colónica y abordaje urológico según el caso y el diagnóstico etiológico. El abordaje laparoscópico puede ser factible en casos muy bien seleccionados y con una situación clínica favorable, teniendo en cuenta que el umbral de conversión debe ser bajo y la intervención ha de ser llevada a cabo por un equipo con experiencia

INTRODUCTION: Colovesical fistulae have significant morbidity. The aim of our study was to describe a case series of benign and malignant colovesical fistulae, focusing on the viability of the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: We reviewed the characteristics of 34 patients with diverticular and colon adenocarcinoma-related colovesical fistulae treated surgically from January 2001 to March 2018, 28 with elective surgery and 6 by urgent surgery. The diagnosis was established by abdominal CT scan, colonoscopy and cystoscopy. Clinically stable patients, with no retroperitoneal or bladder trigone invasion, were approached laparoscopically. RESULTS: There were 13 benign cases (all of them approached by sigmoidectomy), 9 performed by laparoscopy with 3 conversions. Partial cystectomy was done in 11 cases, and in two cases conservative management with urinary catheter. Five laparoscopic approaches were performed in 21 patients diagnosed with malignant colovesical fistula, with 3 conversions and 16 laparotomies. The procedures were sigmoidectomy, left colectomy, anterior resection and pelvic exenteration. All of them required partial or total cystectomy. Sixteen patients had complications, most of which were minor (Clavien-Dindo classificationI-II) and with laparotomy approach. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach can be feasible in well-selected and stable patients, but we have to take into consideration that the conversion rate can be high and this surgery should be performed by experienced surgeons

Colovesical Fistula: Applicability of the Laparoscopic Approach and Results According to Etiology. / Fístula colovesical: aplicabilidad del abordaje laparoscópico y resultados según su etiología.

INTRODUCTION: Colovesical fistulae have significant morbidity. The aim of our study was to describe a case series of benign and malignant colovesical fistulae, focusing on the viability of the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: We reviewed the characteristics of 34 patients with diverticular and colon adenocarcinoma-related colovesical fistulae treated surgically from January 2001 to March 2018, 28 with elective surgery and 6 by urgent surgery. The diagnosis was established by abdominal CT scan, colonoscopy and cystoscopy. Clinically stable patients, with no retroperitoneal or bladder trigone invasion, were approached laparoscopically. RESULTS: There were 13 benign cases (all of them approached by sigmoidectomy), 9 performed by laparoscopy with 3 conversions. Partial cystectomy was done in 11 cases, and in two cases conservative management with urinary catheter. Five laparoscopic approaches were performed in 21 patients diagnosed with malignant colovesical fistula, with 3 conversions and 16 laparotomies. The procedures were sigmoidectomy, left colectomy, anterior resection and pelvic exenteration. All of them required partial or total cystectomy. Sixteen patients had complications, most of which were minor (Clavien-Dindo classificationI-II) and with laparotomy approach. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach can be feasible in well-selected and stable patients, but we have to take into consideration that the conversion rate can be high and this surgery should be performed by experienced surgeons.

Tratamiento mediante microcirugía endoscópica transanal de un hamartoma quístico retrorrectal birrecidivado / Transanal endoscopic microsurgery treatment of twice recurred tail-gut

No disponible

Reparación laparoscópica de una hernia de Morgagni y hemicolectomía derecha ampliada por neoplasia de colon / Laparoscopic assisted repair of Morgagni hernia and extended right colectomy for colon cancer

No disponible

Incarceracion gástrica en hernia periostomal / Gastric incarceration in a peristomal hernia

No disponible

Clinical, Anatomical, and Pathological Grading Score to Predict Technical Difficulty in Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Non-traumatic Diseases.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a grading system based on preoperative parameters that would predict surgical difficulty and morbidity in elective laparoscopic splenectomy. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively assessed morbidity in 439 patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for benign and malignant disorders between 1993 and 2013. Medical and surgical records were reviewed and analyzed. We compared preoperative data concerning demographic, clinical, pathological, anatomical, laboratory, and radiological factors with three surgical outcomes: operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and surgical conversion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify statistically significant variables. A logistic regression model was used to identify determinant variables and to compose a predictive score. External validation of the score was performed using an independent cohort of 353 patients. RESULTS: Four preoperative parameters (age, male sex, type of pathology, and spleen size based on final spleen weight) were significantly related with operative time, operative bleeding, and conversion to open surgery. Using these results, we developed a classification system with three levels of difficulty: low (≤4 points), medium (4.5-5.5 points), and high (≥6 points), based on the four preoperative parameters. The correlation was highly significant (p = <0.001) according to Spearman's correlation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.671 (95 % CI 0.596-0.745). The external validation showed significant correlations with the present model. CONCLUSIONS: The grading score described here is simple to calculate from the physical examination, laboratory tests, and US or CT images, and we believe it could be useful to preoperatively assess the technical complexity of laparoscopic splenectomy.

Impacto del recuento plaquetario preoperatorio en la evolución perioperatoria tras la esplenectomía laparoscópica por púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática / Impact of preoperative platelet count on perioperative outcome after laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

INTRODUCCIÓN: La esplenectomía laparoscópica (EL) es el tratamiento de elección de la púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática (PTI) cuando fracasa el tratamiento médico. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido evaluar la factibilidad y seguridad de la EL según el recuento preoperatorio de plaquetas. MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de una serie de 199 pacientes a los que se les realizó una EL por PTI durante el periodo 1993-2015. Los pacientes se dividieron en 3 grupos según las cifras de plaquetas: grupo I (< 10 × 109 /L), grupo II (10-50 × 109/L) y grupo III(>50 × 109/L). RESULTADOS: El tiempo operatorio fue significativamente menor en el grupo III respecto a los grupos I y II(100 ± 53 y 105 ± 61min; p < 0,025). La pérdida hemática intraoperatoria fue estadísticamente superior en el grupo I (263 ± 551 ml) respecto a los otros 2: grupo II (128 ± 352ml) y grupo III (24 ± 62 ml) (p < 0,003). La estancia hospitalaria de 6,4±5,8 días en el grupo I fue significativamente superior a la de los grupos II y III (3,8±2,3 y 3,2±1,8 días, respectivamente; p < 0,003). CONCLUSIONES: La realización de una EL en pacientes con PTI con recuentos bajos es efectiva y segura

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the preferred treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) when medical treatment fails. The objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LS according to the preoperative platelet count. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a series of 199 patients who underwent LS for ITP from 1993 to 2015. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to platelet count: group I(< 10 × 109/L), group II (10-50 × 109/L) and group III (> 50 × 109/L). RESULTS: Operative time was significantly lower in Group III compared to Group I and II (100 ± 53 and 105 ± 61min, P < .025)). Intraoperative blood loss was statistically higher in group I (263 ± 551ml) with respect to the other 2: group II (128 ± 352 ml) and group III (24 ± 62 ml) (P < .003). Hospital stay was 6.4 ± 5.8 days in group I, significantly higher compared to groups II and III(3.8 ± 2.3 and 3.2 ± 1.8 days, respectively (P < .003)). CONCLUSION: Conducting a LS in ITP patients with low platelet counts is effective and safe

Impact of preoperative platelet count on perioperative outcome after laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. / Impacto del recuento plaquetario preoperatorio en la evolución perioperatoria tras la esplenectomía laparoscópica por púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the preferred treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) when medical treatment fails. The objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LS according to the preoperative platelet count. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of a series of 199 patients who underwent LS for ITP from 1993 to 2015. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to platelet count: group i (<10×10(9)/L), group ii (10-50×10(9)/L) and group iii (> 50×10(9)/L). RESULTS: Operative time was significantly lower in Group III compared to Group I and II (100±53 and 105±61min, P<.025)). Intraoperative blood loss was statistically higher in group i (263±551ml) with respect to the other 2: group ii (128±352ml) and group iii (24±62ml) (P<.003). Hospital stay was 6.4±5.8 days in group i, significantly higher compared to groups ii and iii (3.8±2.3 and 3.2±1.8 days, respectively (P<.003)). CONCLUSION: Conducting a LS in ITP patients with low platelet counts is effective and safe.